<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The first truck crosses under the Demonstration Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mexicotrucker.com/the-first-truck-crosses-under-the-demonstration-program/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mexicotrucker.com/the-first-truck-crosses-under-the-demonstration-program</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:51:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trailero 1</title>
		<link>http://mexicotrucker.com/the-first-truck-crosses-under-the-demonstration-program/comment-page-1#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Trailero 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mexicotrucker.com/archives/697#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Jim, What I stated on the interview was an assumption before knowing who the initial carrier would be.  
Apparently, Mr Paez has been working towards this day for many years and his customer, Regiomontana Building Products had a load for North Carolina and he took it.  
Not known to any of us was that his second truck, the only two authorized under the program for his company, crossed the border in Reynosa with a load for New York state the previous day. 
According to reports today, both of these trucks will be reloading in Arkansas and Alabama for the trip back to Monterrey. Hell of a deadhead, wouldn&#039;t you think? I would not make it nor would most of us.But I also imagine that because of where their reload is, that they are taking steel back to their customer in Monterrey.  
I think with the information available, that I made a valid assumption but we all know what happens when we assume.  
You could say it would cause American drivers to lose loads but consider this. The freight coming across the southern border enjoys a 4% average increase every year and none of us down here see that trend reversing. In Laredo, we have freight sitting in forwarders warehouses looking for trucks to haul it and at a decent rate too.  
The trucks sitting down here are the ones from the medium to mega companies who are waiting for their trailer to return from Mexico.  
If you look on the Melton Transportation yard, there are 20 or more trailers loaded and waiting to be powered and hauled. 
The same holds true for other American carriers such as Warren out of Waterloo Iowa and TCI out of the RGV. 
And what others are ignoring as they continue to push their agendas and accuse every Mexican truck with dual registration of being in the country illegally is that there are more than 800 Mexican motor carriers and bus operators legally permitted to operate anywhere in the U.S. because they were here prior to the border closure in 1982. These carriers, small operations have had zero effect on the American trucking industry and have been ignored by the Teamsters, OOIDA and the public watchdog groups, mainly because they have not presented a safety or economic problem. 
Bottom line is none of us, myself included can say definitively what the effects of this program will be. We can only sit back and watch it develop. But what we can do, again as I do, is look at the facts presented, the statistics available and make an unbiased assessment of the probably outcome. 
Thanks for you comment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, What I stated on the interview was an assumption before knowing who the initial carrier would be. </p>
<p>Apparently, Mr Paez has been working towards this day for many years and his customer, Regiomontana Building Products had a load for North Carolina and he took it. </p>
<p>Not known to any of us was that his second truck, the only two authorized under the program for his company, crossed the border in Reynosa with a load for New York state the previous day.</p>
<p>According to reports today, both of these trucks will be reloading in Arkansas and Alabama for the trip back to Monterrey. Hell of a deadhead, wouldn&#039;t you think? I would not make it nor would most of us.But I also imagine that because of where their reload is, that they are taking steel back to their customer in Monterrey. </p>
<p>I think with the information available, that I made a valid assumption but we all know what happens when we assume. </p>
<p>You could say it would cause American drivers to lose loads but consider this. The freight coming across the southern border enjoys a 4% average increase every year and none of us down here see that trend reversing. In Laredo, we have freight sitting in forwarders warehouses looking for trucks to haul it and at a decent rate too. </p>
<p>The trucks sitting down here are the ones from the medium to mega companies who are waiting for their trailer to return from Mexico. </p>
<p>If you look on the Melton Transportation yard, there are 20 or more trailers loaded and waiting to be powered and hauled.</p>
<p>The same holds true for other American carriers such as Warren out of Waterloo Iowa and TCI out of the RGV.</p>
<p>And what others are ignoring as they continue to push their agendas and accuse every Mexican truck with dual registration of being in the country illegally is that there are more than 800 Mexican motor carriers and bus operators legally permitted to operate anywhere in the U.S. because they were here prior to the border closure in 1982. These carriers, small operations have had zero effect on the American trucking industry and have been ignored by the Teamsters, OOIDA and the public watchdog groups, mainly because they have not presented a safety or economic problem.</p>
<p>Bottom line is none of us, myself included can say definitively what the effects of this program will be. We can only sit back and watch it develop. But what we can do, again as I do, is look at the facts presented, the statistics available and make an unbiased assessment of the probably outcome.</p>
<p>Thanks for you comment. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Wilson</title>
		<link>http://mexicotrucker.com/the-first-truck-crosses-under-the-demonstration-program/comment-page-1#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mexicotrucker.com/archives/697#comment-199</guid>
		<description>I heard you on a recent XM radio interview and you stated that it was likely that the Mexican drivers would initially go only into Texas until they developed routes.  
 
Based on the fact that this driver is headed all the way to North Carolina I guess those routes have been established. I am not a truck driver but cannot help but wonder how this will effect the economics of the American drivers. In the past wouldn&#039;t an American driver have had to take the load from Texas to its final destination? And if this is the case then doesn&#039;t this end up causing American drivers to lose loads? 
 
This goes against what you were saying during your interview and, while I was impressed with your ability to get your message across, now I am left questioning the authenticity of that entire message. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard you on a recent XM radio interview and you stated that it was likely that the Mexican drivers would initially go only into Texas until they developed routes. </p>
<p>Based on the fact that this driver is headed all the way to North Carolina I guess those routes have been established. I am not a truck driver but cannot help but wonder how this will effect the economics of the American drivers. In the past wouldn&#039;t an American driver have had to take the load from Texas to its final destination? And if this is the case then doesn&#039;t this end up causing American drivers to lose loads?</p>
<p>This goes against what you were saying during your interview and, while I was impressed with your ability to get your message across, now I am left questioning the authenticity of that entire message. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

