Alabama revenue enhancement at the expense of Hispanic Commercial Truck Drivers
Jul 17, 2008 Legal Actions, U.S. Trucking News
Alabama State Troopers are enhancing revenue in that state using the vague provisions of FMCSA Regulation 391.11 (b)(2), the controversial rule requiring CDL holders to be conversant in English
This rule leaves it up to the individual officer or inspector to determine, in his mind, what is “sufficient”.
This can be open to abuse and a persons personal prejudice due to the vague nature of the regulation.
FMCSA Regulation 391.11 (b)(2) Can read and speak the English language sufficiently to converse with the general public, to understand highway traffic signs and signals in the English language, to respond to official inquiries, and to make entries on reports and records
The question that begs to be answered in this case is, did the trooper expect this driver to speak perfect Oxford (Al) english? Perhaps so.
Manuel Castillo was driving a truck through Alabama hauling onions and left with a $500 ticket for something he didn’t think he was doing: speaking English poorly.
Castillo, who was stopped on his way back to California, said he knows federal law requires him to be able to converse in English with an officer but he thought his language skills were good enough to avoid a ticket. Read the rest of this entry »
This post was read 246 times until now
Tags: Alabama, discrimination, English language, FMCSA














