23/03/2009  Posted by PMC at 14:31 on 23/03/2009

Now that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the convictions (with a small adjustment) of Ramos And Compean and the Supreme Court has refused to hear the case, perhaps people will begin to see these two for what they are.

They’re not criminals in the sense that we see criminals, but they did knowingly break the law and with the commutation, received appropriate sentences, but they remain two convicted felons, rightfully so. Their stupidity lead to their being charged and convicted. And probably without any willful criminal intent in the beginning. But they are not “Brave Patriotic Americans”. Simply two dumbasses that made the wrong choice.

That right, the Houston Chronicle is reporting that Supreme Court refuses ex-Border Patrol agents’ appeal

This effectively puts to rest any hopes these two have of having their felony convictions overturned.

Is this a vindication of the much-maligned Johnny Sutton (and the trial judge, and the Fifth Circuit justices, all of whom some have suggested were involved, along with the Bush Administration, in some Oliver Stone-like conspiracy) or an indication that SCOTUS is satisfied the men are now free?

Or to put it another way. Who is better able to decide the legalities of this case? The 5th Circuit and the Justices of the Supreme Court, or people like Lou Dobbs, Tom Tancredo, Glenn Beck, Joe Loya and all the others who spun this case into something that resembled nothing like what occurred and is part of the official record.

Legally speaking, of course, it upholds the government’s case. And I’ll put my money on the Justices.

Related posts:

  1. 1 million truck violations cited at border crossing? The rest of the story
  2. 1 million truck violations cited at border crossing? The story behind the story
  3. A major win for OOIDA and Truckers as US 7th Court of Appeals tosses EOBR mandate
  4. Cross Border Agreement signed. OOIDA already in Court – Higher Tariffs possible as a result
  5. OOIDA loses first round in lawsuit against Mexican cross border program
  • mike

    i think the main issue was the weapon-firing charge, which tacked on the TEN years to their convictions. if every law officer had that dangling over their heads, it would create a chilling effect.

    • http://mexicotrucker.com PMC

      I agree.

      I think the Prosecutor threw that charge in there because of the manner in which Ramos and Compean did not cooperate, and lied and tried to hide the initial crime.

      Also, it could have been thrown in there as a negotiating tool to force them to take the plea deal of 18 months which they refused to do.

   

Get Cloud PHP Hosting on CatN