Aug 17

It’s been almost 10 years since I’ve had the opportunity to deliver a load here in the San Diego area, and the changes are enormous.

The old 76 fuel stop on 905 where we used to fight for the few parking spaces in the dirt has that area fenced off and a new Pilot is across the street.

CHP has a new inspection facility half a block from the commercial crossing, where every truck coming in from Mexico is directed to.

The drop yard we use of Enrique Firmi was a surprise, inasmuch every trailer had it lights in place, glad hand gaskets, none missing, a marked change from the old days.

The area around Otay Mesa is where Hoffa and some of his union goons made their photo op in 07 protesting the impending Cross Border Pilot Program. They stood around with their protest signs, yelling and making angry gestures at the Mexican drivers, who were doing nothing other than the job they were hired to do.

They ignored the new or newer drayage trucks and focused the photo op on older cabovers that in their minds were junk, ignoring the fact that these trucks, all of them, had crossed the CHP inspection facility moments earlier.

And for those who operate in or through California, we all know what pricks the CHP commercial officers can be.

Every Truck, Every Time

That was the comments made by former Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, pertaining to trucks from Mexico. And it was a comment immediately seized upon and ridiculed by the opponents. Yet is was more misinformation and lies by the opposition.

From Texas to California, these inspections stations are right at the border, as required under Congressional directives for the Pilot program. Every truck crossing the border gets a visual inspection and document inspection. If something is apparent, they are pulled in for a random level I. It is a system that works.

As I dropped my trailer in the transfer yard, I was looking around for the dangerous unsafe junk trucks that Spencer and Hoffa insist are the norm rather than the exception. Not surprisingly, I found none, unless you count the ones retired from service, and sitting in the lots with bald flat tires, busted windshields covered with layers of dust from years of inactivity.

What I did see, at this one location, and others on the highway, were a fleet of late model, 2002 or newer, Internationals and Freightliner Centuries.

All the units were dual registered, in California and Baja California. Most had current CVSA stickers indicating they had been through a level 1 inspection recently. And oddly enough, since they are always talking about security issues south of the border, most of these units had a sign on the side of the cab, in English and Spanish (sorry all you English only freaks) that said, and I paraphrase,
This truck equipped with a GPS tracking unit. The driver does not know where it is, how it works or how to disable it”

Kinda hoaky but probably effective.

Most of the transfer yards are within spitting distance of the border crossing. In the case of Crown Express, three blocks. Crown Express is the service agent for my company, Celadon, Messilla Valley and others.

So the length of haul for these trucks is 3 blocks in the US and maybe 10 miles into the Tijuana industrial areas, although many are equi-distance on the Mexican side.

I spoke with the dispatchers in the office, all who spoke perfect English despite living in Tijuana and commuting to work in the US.

One of the questions asked was about the alleged Army or Police escorts that some have claimed are a regular occurrence escorting trucks to the border crossing on the Mexican side. They didn’t know what I was talking about and denied it happening. In addition, the highjacking of trucks, allegedly an every day occurrence, if you listen to the opposition, rarely happens.

An interesting day as tomorrow promises to be. If I have the time, I plan on further efforts to debunk the claims of the opposition, concerning border operations in this area.

Share the Knowledge:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
Tagged with:
Aug 17

The Three Amigos summit last weekend in Guadalajara should have brought some news of the Obama’s administration’s efforts to reinstate the wrongfully terminated cross border trucking program and replace it with a permanent solution which would enable us to fulfill our obligations under NAFTA. So far, nothing definite has come from the two day meeting.

The Obama administration and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood are playing it close to the vest this time, as they should, to prevent the usual purveyors of false information from employing their scare tactics once again.

But the mere mention of Mexican trucks starts one of the usual suspects in the issue to begin there campaign of fear and misinformation.

OOIDA Action Alert

Who else but OOIDA, although admittedly, they have calmed their rhetoric somewhat. I think they are resigned to the inevitable.

But still, they’re relying on the “fear factor” to motivate their members. Here is an example of their latest effort.

If proponents of cross-border trucking with Mexico have their way, the jobs of all U.S.-based long-haul truckers will be in serious jeopardy — YOUR JOB. You need to convey that message when you are talking with government officials. In addition, you should tell them that granting Mexican trucks full access to U.S. highways makes NO SENSE because none of the safety or security issues have been resolved on either side of the border!

Am I over reacting to OOIDA’s theatrics? I don’t think so. Look at the numbers.

Mexico has approximately 250,000 Federally licensed truckers compared to the estimated 3 million or more in the US. If we’re to believe OOIDA, then Mexican truckers and transportation companies are prepared to turn their backs on their own countries needs to come and take all of our jobs? Yeah right!

And according to the interview in the July issue of NATSO Truckers News, which confirmed what I’ve said all along, rates in Mexico are almost double what they are in the US. Mexican truckers don’t want to haul our freight. They want to bring their freight to it’s US destination and return to Mexico with freight for their customers.

They actually fear our people coming down there and destroying their rates. And it could happen!

And of course Todd Spencer keeps pushing the idea that Mexico MUST establish a regulatory structure as we have here in the US in order to meet our standards, which could not be further from the truth.

The ruling of the Arbitration panel said that the US was permitted to put in place standards of safety and compliance that Mexican trucks must meet in order to operate in this country.

In other word, when they cross the border, they must be able to comply with our safety standards The 18 month pilot program proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that they could comply.

The Teamsters and Others

Interestingly enough, one of the more obnoxious critics, James Hoffa, President of the Teamsters, hasn’t been heard from in this latest debate.

Before, every word out of his mouth about the Mexican truck issued was prefaced with “dangerous” or “unsafe”, something that was debunked early in the debate.

Me wonders what kind of deal was reached or promises made to him to shut him up. Whatever it was, it was effective. Or perhaps, he is more concerned with his problems at YRC at the moment.

American’s in Support of allowing Mexican trucks

In the scheme of things, there is only a small section of the American public that opposes the idea of allowing Mexican trucks into the US. I know, there was a recent poll that suggested otherwise, but we’ll touch on that in a moment.

During the comment period back in 2007, only 2400 comments were received. 99% of them negative and not pertaining to Mexican trucks per se, but focusing on the illegal immigration debate and more bigoted comments. That is the stated reason FMCSA ignored the comments and proceeded with the program.

2400 comments our of 3 million CDL holders? 2400 comments out of an alleged 161,000 members of OOIDA and 1.4 million members of the Teamsters? Hardly a blip on the radar. But a small minority with loud nasty uninformed voices to be certain.

But calmer heads persevere such as this blogger:

A Conservative Techiewrites:

Why should one care about this? The government fought back against this by declaring a tariff (which it was allowed to do under NAFTA) for a total of $2.4 billion. The state I’m from (Michigan) is one of those states affected by these tariffs. The article states that Appleton Papers in Wisconsin supplies 75 percent of the paper that Mexico uses, now thanks to the tariffs laid against them, they are looking to lay people off

Jay Thompson writing in THE TRUCKER

let’s don’t let facts get in the way of a good story. Mexican trucks have been running in the US for a long time and are pretty safe. For reference, US-domiciled trucking fleets have safety violations at 7% for drivers and 23% for vehicles. There are 850+ Mexican carriers operating 1,700 trucks in the US that were grandfathered in from the 1984-1992 time period that have violations that are half that for drivers at 3% and on par for equipment at 23%. Even the 7,000 carriers with trucks operating in the commercial zones had low number for driver violations at 1% and on par for equipment at 22%.

And we could go on, but you get the point.

New Poll claims 66% Oppose Mexican Trucks On U.S. Highways
Rasmussen, a polling site with a decidedly right wing leaning released a poll suggesting 66% of American’s oppose Mexican trucks in the US. And of course, Todd Spencer of OOIDA is all over this, as expected.
TODD SPENCER – OOIDA

“This proves that Americans see very clearly what we’ve been saying for nearly three years,” said Todd Spencer, Executive Vice President. “It’s not safe to open the border, not yet anyway. Not until Mexico raises its standards and can comply with our ever-increasing regulations for safety and security.”

Actually, it proves nothing. other than that 660 people out of 1,000 polled reacted negatively to the question.

The question asked was one of three, the other two not having anything to do with Mexican trucks, but rather Obama’s tri lateral summit in Guadalajara and the “Buy American” provision in the stimulus bill.

The question asked was”
Mexico wants President Obama’s help to end the ban on Mexican trucks operating in the United States. Should Congress let trucks from Mexico cross the border and carry their loads on American highways?
The response:
19% Yes
66% No
15% Not sure

Having followed Rasmussen polls for some time, it is apparent that the majority of there polls favor the Republican positions, in the way the questions are asked, and I suspect the demographics of those sampled.

So again, it proves nothing more than that 660 of the respondents said no. 190 said yes and 150 were not sure. Out of a population of 330 million? You do the math.

On the other hand, a poll I’ve had running on this site for several month shows 85% of respondents, now over 6.000 believe that we should honor our obligation to Mexico

Should the US honor it's word and reinstate the Mexican Cross Border Demonstration Project?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

But again. I could be saying that the majority of American’s favor letting them in. But would it be a majority? Nope! Only 85% of the 6,000+ who took the time to respond to the poll.

The tariff’s are not illegal as Spencer and other’s claim. To the contrary, they are authorized by the arbitration agreement, and while they may seem excessive, wait until Mexico imposes tariff’s on meat and poultry products, which they legally can do.

The opponent of allowing Mexican trucks into the US for the past 17 have continuously instructed their congressional stooges in Washington to throw up road blocks and challenges that Mexico has patiently met and complied with. Now Spencer and other want this to continue.

Mexico, rightfully fed up with the bullshit, imposed the tariff’s and are standing firm. More than 15,000 American jobs are in jeopardy at a time when we need jobs.

When these jobs disappear, because of these tariff’s, you can’t blame Mexico. The blame sits squarely on the shoulders of Todd Spencer, Jim Johnston and their Congressional stooges who refuse to do the right thing and lift their wrongful and ludicrous opposition to the trucks from Mexico.

Share the Knowledge:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
Tagged with:
Aug 17
In an unexpected move, Mexico replaced 700 Customs Inspectors with 1400 newly trained and vetted personnel in an effort to ramp up inbound security and to fight tax evasion on big ticket items

In an unexpected move, Mexico replaced 700 Customs Inspectors with 1400 newly trained and vetted personnel in an effort to ramp up inbound security and to fight tax evasion on big ticket items

Mexico has replaced all 700 of its customs inspectors with agents newly trained to detect contraband, from guns and drugs to TVs and other big-ticket appliances smuggled to avoid import duties.

The shake-up — part of a broader effort to root out corruption and improve vigilance at Mexican ports with new technology — doubled the size of Mexico’s customs inspection force.

The inspectors were replaced with 1,400 agents who have undergone background checks and months of training, Tax Administration Service spokesman Pedro Canabal said Sunday.

He said the previous inspectors were not fired. Instead, government did not rehire them when their contracts expired, Canabal said.

The main focus of the overhaul is to combat tax evasion, although Mexico is also trying to seize more guns smuggled in from the United States and elsewhere that end up in the hands of ruthless drug gangs. Mexican cartels are responsible for the majority of cocaine smuggled from South America to the United States.

Custom inspectors turned over their weapons to soldiers before leaving their posts at airports and border crossings across the country Saturday night.

Enrique Torres, a spokesman for the military and federal police in the northern city of Ciudad Juarez, said soldiers were at the border crossing with El Paso, Texas, to help avoid violence during the transition.

The new agents, most of whom have post-high school education, were chosen in a “strict selection process that included psychological and toxicological checks, as well as the necessary investigations to ensure they have no criminal record,” according to a Tax Administration statement.

They were trained in legal aspects of foreign trade and taught to use new equipment installed at border crossings, including X-ray and gamma ray machines to scan for hidden contraband. More dogs trained to sniff out drugs and other banned goods are also being added.

“We need more than just a body with a weapon,” Canabal said.

Mexico has been checking only 10 percent of the 230,000 vehicles that cross the border each day, according to the federal Attorney General’s Office.

Now, with new technology, agents will weigh and photograph every car and truck that crosses the border and run license plate numbers through a database of suspicious vehicles in the hopes of catching more hidden contraband.
DAMMIT ALL TO HELL! AND JUST AS I WAS PLANNING ON BUYING A 52″ PLASMA AND TAKING IT ACROSS TO THE HOUSE! THEY COULDN’T HAVE WAITED ANOTHER WEEK?

Share the Knowledge:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
Aug 06

Trucking related enforcement actions by the CBP.

*This overview is compiled from incidents reported to the Office of Border Patrol and is not intended to reflect all Border Patrol enforcement actions. Most arrests and seizures fail to meet the requirements for mandatory reporting to the Office of Border Patrol.

Reported on July 30, 2009

El Centro Sector – Border Patrol agents arrested two nationals of Mexico, 35 illegal aliens from Mexico, and seized two 1999 tractor-trailers near Brawley, California. A Border Patrol canine alerted to both vehicles, and agents subsequently discovered 26 subjects locked inside one trailer and nine additional subjects concealed in the cab of the second tractor.

Reported on August 5, 2009

Laredo Sector – Border Patrol agents seized 1,279 pounds of marijuana valued at $1,018,560, a 2000 International tractor-trailer, and arrested a USC at the traffic checkpoint near Laredo, Texas. The subject presented himself for inspection and a Border Patrol canine alerted to the trailer. A search revealed 77 bundles of marijuana within the cargo.

Rio Grande Valley Sector – Border Patrol agents seized 1,254 pounds of marijuana valued at $1,003,520, a 1996 Freightliner tractor-trailer, and arrested a USC at the traffic checkpoint near Falfurrias, Texas. A Border Patrol canine alerted to the trailer and agents discovered the marijuana concealed in a false wall compartment in the trailer.

Further proof that the majority of drugs seized are being smuggled inland by American truckers.

Share the Knowledge:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
Tagged with:
Aug 06

WASHINGTON — Mexican President Felipe Calderon will press President Barack Obama Sunday for a quick resolution to a cross-border trucking dispute that prompted Mexico to retaliate on $2.4 billion of U.S. goods, a news agency reported today.

“President Calderon will press forward our position and it will be great if we can get this solved at the latest by the end of this year,” a Mexican official told Reuters on Wednesday, speaking on condition that he not be identified.

Calderon will host Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper at a meeting in Guadalajara of the leaders of the North American Free Trade Agreement beginning Sunday.

The U.S. agreed in NAFTA to allow Mexican commercial trucks to transport goods within four U.S. border states in 1995 and throughout the country in 2000, but delayed implementation on safety grounds.

A Cross Border Demonstration Project was initiated in 2007, but the pilot program was killed by a vote of Congress earlier this year, prompting Calderon’s administration to retaliate with $2.4 billion U.S. manufacturing and agricultural goods tariff.

“When Congress decided to defund the program, we were told at the time they would come forward with something concrete relatively soon,” the Mexican official said.

Almost immediately after Obama signed the bill ending the demonstration project, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood held a round of meetings with Congressional leaders and trucking industry stakeholders after the White House told LaHood to work with Congress, the Transportation and State departments and Mexican officials to come up with legislation to create a new trucking project that will meet concerns over North American Free Trade Agreement commitments.

Meanwhile, Rep. Kevin Brady, a Texas Republican who wrote Obama in March to urge quick action on the issue, is quoted onwww.Mexicotrucker.com as saying he found it unimaginable that Obama would go to Mexico without some positive news for Calderon.< The president going to Mexico and not trying to resolve the trucking dispute would be like going to the G20 and ignoring the financial crisis,” Brady said, according to the Web site. “This is a very real dispute. The clock is ticking and there’s a lot of American farmers and manufacturers that are paying a pretty steep price.

SOURCE: The Trucker News Service & Reuter

Share the Knowledge:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
Aug 04

Trucks such as this Kenworth T660 are now the norm in Mexico, despite claims to the contrary by the protectionists opposing allowing these trucks into the US

Trucks such as this Kenworth T660 are now the norm in Mexico, despite claims to the contrary by the protectionists opposing allowing these trucks into the US

U.S. business groups are growing increasingly frustrated with President Barack Obama’s failure to resolve a cross-border trucking dispute with Mexico they say has threatened thousands of American jobs.

“We’ve got companies that are really concerned,” said Frank Vargo, vice president for international economic affairs at the National Association of Manufacturers.

“Our calculation is that we’ve got 15,000 jobs at risk and the longer this goes on, the more likely it is that Mexican buyers are shifting suppliers,” Vargo said.

U.S. manufacturers hold out hope Obama’s meeting early next week in Guadalajara with Mexican President Felipe Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper could set the stage for action in Congress later this year.

Representative Kevin Brady, a Texas Republican who wrote Obama in March to urge quick action on the issue, said he found it unimaginable that Obama would go to Mexico without some positive news for Calderon.

“The president going to Mexico and not trying to resolve the trucking dispute would be like going to the G20 and ignoring the financial crisis,” Brady said.

“This is a very real dispute. The clock is ticking and there’s a lot of American farmers and manufacturers that are paying a pretty steep price,” he said.

In the meantime, U.S. paper producers, potato farmers, grape growers and other businesses are suffering lost sales because of the duties Mexico imposed, Mulder said.

UNFULFILLED NAFTA COMMITMENT

Calderon’s administration took the move after Obama signed a 2009 spending bill that canceled a pilot program allowing Mexican trucks to operate beyond a 25-mile (40-km) commercial zone along the U.S. border with its southern neighbor.

The program was designed by the Bush administration to make good on a much-delayed U.S. commitment in the North American Free Trade Agreement to open its roads to Mexican trucks.

Congress killed the program because of what it called safety concerns, but Mexico said correctly said the move was really just disguised protectionism enacted on behalf of the powerful U.S. Teamsters union.

U.S. Trade Representative speaks out

In a reply to a letter sent by a Congressional stooge of OOIDA demanding answers concerning the legitimate tariff’s Mexico placed when the Pilot Program was canceled, USTR Kirk responded the best way to settle the situation was to open the border as we agreed. The tariff’s would go away.

When asked if his office was considering court actions against the tariff, Kirk responded saying the tariff’s might be lowered, but they would still be in place.

OOIDA still pushing debunked falsehoods

On todays, “LANDLINENOW” program, Mark Reddig continued to push the debunked and absurd suggestion that Mexico has no regulatory structure, no certified drug labs (I guess in his mind, a government testing center is not “certified”) and other nonsense they’ve been throwing out the past couple of years.

Although, he did appear to concede that maybe Mexico has some decent trucks (wonder if he as seen our galleries) he still maintains that Mexican trucks are cast off pieces of junk. Something most of us know to be not true.

But he continues to urge his shrinking member base to annoy Congress with their uninformed rhetoric in an attempt to derail any new attempts for the Obama administration to comply with our legal obligations.

OOIDA seems to have run out of steam, other than regurgitating droll and totally false claims. What they’ve latched onto now, is something called “Standards”. And of course, putting their totally frivolous spin on it.

They claim that the arbitration ruling by the NAFTA panel gave the US the right to demand that Mexico adopt standards equal to ours, and their not doing so negates our obligations under the treaty. This is more bullshit!

When the NAFTA arbitration panel ruled, they said the US had the “right” to demand Mexican trucks meet our standards.

The intent of this language is quiet clear. Mexican trucks desiring authority to operate in this country must demonstrate they can meet and operate under our legal and regulatory standards, WHEN OPERATING IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

The 18 months of the previous Cross Border Program proved conclusively, that they can and do comply with our rules and regs, more so than US truckers, according to the FMCSA reports and the DOT/OIG Final Report on the program.

Time for the US to keep it’s word for a change and comply with our obligations in this issue.

Otherwise, don’t blame the Obama Administration for loss of jobs!

SOURCES: Reuters

Share the Knowledge:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
Tagged with:
preload preload preload