Keep on Truckin baby! Other’s share Mexico Trucker’s Opinions

Star-Telegram
To hear Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., tell it, Congress is in a tizzy because the Bush administration has not halted the pilot program that allows some Mexican trucking companies to send their big rigs deep into the United States. Many of those trucks, of course, follow interstate highways into and through Tarrant County.

Dorgan has sent a letter to Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, calling the program under which 11 Mexican companies have been given permits to drive 56 trucks beyond the border “both arrogant and wrong!”

His outrage comes because Congress passed, and President Bush has signed, a transportation funding bill that rules out spending money to “establish” such a program. The administration counters that the current program, which could allow for as many as 500 trucks from 100 Mexican companies into the U.S., was established in September, long before Congress acted. The administration promises not to establish any new programs, but it plans to continue this one.

Of course, the real reason why Dorgan and others in Congress are upset is that the union that represents U.S. truckers is upset. Teamsters see the Mexican trucks as a threat to their livelihood.

It’s not like this is a new fight. It’s been dragging on in one way or another since the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement called for cross-border freight hauling. For all these years, the Teamsters have been able to delay implementation of this part of NAFTA.

And it’s not like there were no Mexican trucks on U.S. highways even before the current program was implemented. A few Mexican companies have been allowed to cross the border for some time.

The primary argument is that the Mexican trucks might not be safe, but the pilot program also has included assigning more than 500 inspectors to enforce safety, vehicle and driver standards.

Finally, it must be assumed that members of Congress chose the wording of the transportation funding bill carefully. If they really wanted to forbid spending money on the cross-border program, surely our lawmakers would have blocked operation, not just the establishment, of such a plan.

The Teamsters are fighting the program in court. That’s a good place to resolve this issue.
Read the stupidity of the comments to this excellent article here!

UPDATE

It seems more and more mainstream newspapers are questioning the misinformation being thrown around about this program and beginning to look into it in depth and arriving at the same conclusions we have from the beginning.

The Houston Chronicle is the latest to do so


View this Post in: Spanish

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Webnews
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • blogmarks
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live-MSN
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • YahooBuzz
  • YahooMyWeb

This post was read 90 times until now

These might be of interest

One Response to “Keep on Truckin baby! Other’s share Mexico Trucker’s Opinions”

  1. wweisser Says:

    They’re a bunch of lawyers! If lawyers know nothing else, they know how to word something so it’s specific.

    They wrote it exactly how they wanted it, it wasn’t any kind of error or oversight.


    View this Comment in: Spanish


Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. In addition, under the conditions of the FAIR USE NOTICE, The material used on Mexico Trucker may be copyrighted material, and the use of it on Mexicotrucker.com may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available on a non-profit basis for educational and discussion purposes only. We believe this constitutes a ‘FAIR USE’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 USC § 107. For more information go to: <url>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml</url> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘FAIR USE’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Additionally, we reserve to moderate, edit or delete any comments which are designed to be slanderous, libelous or a deliberate attack against the character of the sites owners. Debate is good. Personal attacks will not be tolerated.