“You can’t fix stupid” - Jim White - KMOX - St. Louis

MORE OOIDA LIES EXPOSED!

Back in the late 80’s there was a late night talk show host on KMOX in St. Louis, whose motto was, “You can’t fix Stupid”! Jim White, retired now and on his boat somewhere on the Mississippi perhaps.

Todd Spencer - “You can’t fix stupid”And that holds particularly true these days anytime Todd Spencer of OOIDA makes a comment. What’s he up to this time? And how has Mexico Trucker exposed more of his lies? Lies he uses to push his agenda? Read on!

This article published in THE TRUCKER today is a prime example!

OOIDA asks FMCSA for complete, accurate data on approved Mexican trucks

GRAIN VALLEY, Mo. — The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) often claims Mexican trucks are safer than U.S. trucks, but available data doesn’t back up those claims, the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) stated in a news release.

OOIDA requested that FMCSA provide explanations as to why certain carriers have been given approval to enter the United States when little or no data is available to demonstrate how they have fully complied with all applicable laws on safety and security. The request was included in OOIDA’s comments posted to the FMCSA public notice in the Federal Register. That notice discloses several Mexico-domiciled motor carriers that have passed a Pre-Authority Safety Audit (PASA).

In review of the published notice, OOIDA found it only shows whether certain Mexican motor carriers passed certain categories, but nothing about the data relied upon to make those determinations.

“It’s like they are still making it up as they go along,” OOIDA Executive Vice President Todd Spencer said. “They just go ahead and say it passes, therefore it’s supposed to be accepted as true.”

Because no specifics were available in the public notice, OOIDA then reviewed FMCSA’s SafetStat database and found several red flags on the companies receiving a go from PASA.

For example, according to OOIDA, one approved carrier, Avomex International, shows a pattern of tolerance for Hours of Service violations by its drivers. During 172 inspections conducted between Sept. 21, 2006, and Sept. 21 of this year the company was cited for 206 violations. Running five trucks in the U.S., that averages slightly more than 40 violations per truck.

“And that gets an approved PASA?” asked Spencer. “This is just one of several examples we found that no authority should be granted to any Mexican motor carriers.”

So let’s take a look at AVOMEX INTERNATIONAL that Spencer claims is so bad and we’ll see how Todd Spencer corrupted the for his own mean.

COMPANY SNAPSHOT

US DOT: 1142107Z Docket Number: MX462940
Doing-Business-As Name:
Business Address
BusinessTelephone and Fax
Mail Address
MailTelephone and Fax
UndeliverableMail
Authority Type
Authority Status
Application Pending
Property
Passenger
Household Goods
Private
Enterprise
Insurance Type
Insurance Required
Insurance on File
Application Type: Provisional Date: Current Status: Current Status Date:

US Common Carrier authority since 2003, permanent authority issued in 2005! Is this a participant in the pilot truck program, or a Mexican carrier using a relative (legally) to obtain operating authority in the US. Let’s look further.

PENDING APPLICATIONS

Pending Application

US DOT: 1142107Z Docket Number: MX462940
Auth Type Filed Status Insurance BOC-3

Ok, nothing bad here. Insurance problem in 2003. Common carrier still current, Contract carrier application pending.

SAFERSYS STATS (The ones Todd Spencer has misquoted)

Entity Type: Carrier
Out of Service (Interstate Only): No Out of Service Date: None
Legal Name: AVOMEX INTERNATIONAL SA DE CV
DBA Name:  
Physical Address: CARRETERA SABINAS ROSITA KM 1
SABINAS, CH 26740
Phone: (861) 613-0899
Mailing Address: PO BOX 1388
KELLER, TX 76244
USDOT Number: 1142107 State Carrier ID Number:  
MC or MX Number: 462940 DUNS Number:
Power Units: 5 Drivers: 5
MCS-150 Form Date: 06/26/2006 MCS-150 Mileage (Year): 210,000 (2004)
Operation Classification:
X Auth. For Hire
  Exempt For Hire
X Private(Property)
  Priv. Pass. (Business)
  Priv. Pass.(Non-business)
  Migrant
  U.S. Mail
  Fed. Gov’t
  State Gov’t
  Local Gov’t
  Indian Nation
X NEW APPLIC
Carrier Operation:
X Interstate
  Intrastate Only (HM)
  Intrastate Only (Non-HM)
Cargo Carried:
X General Freight
  Household Goods
  Metal: sheets, coils, rolls
  Motor Vehicles
  Drive/Tow away
  Logs, Poles, Beams, Lumber
  Building Materials
  Mobile Homes
  Machinery, Large Objects
X Fresh Produce
  Liquids/Gases
  Intermodal Cont.
  Passengers
  Oilfield Equipment
  Livestock
  Grain, Feed, Hay
  Coal/Coke
  Meat
  Garbage/Refuse
  US Mail
  Chemicals
  Commodities Dry Bulk
  Refrigerated Food
X Beverages
  Paper Products
  Utilities
  Agricultural/Farm Supplies
  Construction
  Water Well
   

Inspection results for 24 months prior to: 11/03/2007

Total inspections: 338
Note: Total inspections may be less than the sum of vehicle, driver, and hazmat inspections. Go to Inspections Help for further information.

Inspections:

Inspection Type Vehicle Driver Hazmat
Inspections 314 338 0
Out of Service 34 1 0
Out of Service % 10.8% 0.3% 0%
Nat’l Average %
(2005-2006)
23.14% 6.80% 5.39%

Crashes reported to FMCSA by states for 24 months prior to: 11/03/2007

Crashes:

Type Fatal Injury Tow Total
Crashes 0 0 0 0

Now, Todd Spencer is claiming between 6/21/2006 and 6/21/2007, this carrier was inspected 172 with a resulting 206 violations! Where do you get your numbers Todd? Out of a Cracker Jacks box? You claim you get them from FMCSA Safersys, but we are looking at the true numbers. There are no 206 violations. To the contrary, the numbers suggest another Mexican trucking company with lower violations and a safer operation than most American companies of comparable size.Todd Spencer, your bullshit is showing you to be increasingly irrelevant.Listening to Brooklyn, Trucking Bozo and Rusty Wade this afternoon on the Trucking Bozo show extolling the virtues of OOIDA and trying to convince us the solution to all that ails the American trucking industry is to join OOIDA? Let’s get real people. OOIDA has nothing to back up their objection to Mexican trucks so they resort to skewing the truth.UPDATE:

After extensive research, I can say with authority that AVOMEX INTERNATIONAL, is not a participant nor have they applied to be a participant in the Mexican Pilot Truck Program. It might be they applied and then withdrew, but I find no evidence of that.

Todd Spencer, as usual, mincing words, does not say SPECIFICALLY, that they are part of the program, but only insinuates it, in order to put his warped perspective across to the media.


View this Post in: Spanish

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Webnews
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • blogmarks
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live-MSN
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • YahooBuzz
  • YahooMyWeb

This post was read 133 times until now

These might be of interest

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. In addition, under the conditions of the FAIR USE NOTICE, The material used on Mexico Trucker may be copyrighted material, and the use of it on Mexicotrucker.com may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available on a non-profit basis for educational and discussion purposes only. We believe this constitutes a ‘FAIR USE’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 USC § 107. For more information go to: <url>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml</url> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘FAIR USE’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Additionally, we reserve to moderate, edit or delete any comments which are designed to be slanderous, libelous or a deliberate attack against the character of the sites owners. Debate is good. Personal attacks will not be tolerated.