A load of concern over Mexican trucks

Further proving my point that news organizations are stepping back and taking a new look at the Mexican truck issue, and not being so quick to rush to support the critics who position is anchored in exaggerated half truths and hysterical accusations.

This article, in the Los Angeles Times illustrates this while pointing out some rather obvious facts.

The fear that poorly trained Mexican truckers would jeopardize American lives may have some public appeal, but under the surface there are some problems with the argument.

The coalition that has fought the administration’s move is made up of groups that have different agendas: unions protecting jobs, the anti-immigration crowd protecting borders and highway safety groups.

On Sept. 6, a large group of Teamsters from Local 542 in San Diego held a rally to oppose the program, which the union has been doing ever since the inception of NAFTA, said Ken Lundgren, secretary treasurer of the local.

“We don’t believe they can comply with our standards,” Lundgren said. “A lot of people are trying to whitewash this issue. These trucks are in dilapidated condition.”

Lundgren asserts Mexican authorities don’t do enough criminal-background checks and drug testing of drivers. “There’s no way of checking how many hours they have been driving before reaching our border,” he adds. (They don’t do criminal background checks on US drivers so why should they on Mexican drivers, but yes, Mexico does do criminal checks as part of the licensing procedure and the US does criminal background checks as part of granting the B1/B2 Laser Visa to enter the country. Facts conveniently missing from this arguement)
Eduardo Martinez, an economist at the Los Angeles Economic Development Corp., said the opponents have badly mischaracterized the Mexican trucking industry and tried to link this issue to immigration problems, national security risks and the drug trade. Instead, it is a simple economic trade issue.

As the Mexican economy grows, the U.S. is going to have to accept the ability of Mexican corporations to conduct their operations at international standards, Martinez said.

Martinez points to Orowheat, the premium bread sold in U.S. grocery stores. It is part of Mexico-based Grupo Bimbo, which has bakeries in both countries. If Americans can accept the safety of food delivered by a Mexican-based operation, why not trucks?

No doubt, Mexico has some trucks in lousy condition and some drivers who need to go back to driving school.

But you can be sure that Mexico does not have a monopoly on bad truck drivers or unsafe trucks.

I’d like to see Boxer and Feinstein take the same level of interest in the Long Beach Freeway, which is clogged with rundown rigs that service the massive ports in our harbor.

Well said and enough said!


View this Post in: Spanish

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Webnews
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • blogmarks
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live-MSN
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • YahooBuzz
  • YahooMyWeb

This post was read 78 times until now

These might be of interest

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. In addition, under the conditions of the FAIR USE NOTICE, The material used on Mexico Trucker may be copyrighted material, and the use of it on Mexicotrucker.com may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available on a non-profit basis for educational and discussion purposes only. We believe this constitutes a ‘FAIR USE’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 USC § 107. For more information go to: <url>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml</url> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘FAIR USE’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Additionally, we reserve to moderate, edit or delete any comments which are designed to be slanderous, libelous or a deliberate attack against the character of the sites owners. Debate is good. Personal attacks will not be tolerated.