Another frivolous lawsuit and another motion DENIED!!

Editors Note: They just keep at it don’t they. Despite being kicked back time and again using the same lame arguments with a different spin. I wonder if OOIDA members appreciated their hard earned membership dues being used in this frivolous manner

The lawsuit filed by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association challenging the cross-border program is moving forward – the only question is what court is going to hear the case.

In an order issued late today by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the request made by OOIDA for an emergency stay of the program was denied. The court, however, did not rule whatsoever on the merits of the case.

“The decision does not reflect the merits of the case against the DOT,” said OOIDA President and CEO Jim Johnston. “The case will still be heard and we are preparing to move forward with that, plus the legislative actions we are taking in Washington, DC.”

(Yeah, like filling the hip pockets of members of Congress?)

Because of OOIDA’s lawsuit being filed in the DC Circuit, and another lawsuit challenging the program filed in California by the Sierra Club in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the court assigned the case to the Judicial Panel of Multidistrict Litigation to decide what Court of Appeals will hear the two cases.

While the panel is deciding where the court challenges of the cross-border program will be heard, the Department of Transportation will be able to continue its cross-border program.

Once the panel decides which district of the Court of Appeals will hear the cases, a court calendar will be set and the cases will proceed.

In the court’s order assigning the case to the panel and denying the stay, the court also acknowledged the fact that OOIDA’s legal challenge of the program was filed in a timely manner, possibly eliminating at least one argument against OOIDA’s lawsuit DOT could bring up in court.

“We believe we have a very strong case on the merits,” Johnston said. “It’s just a matter now of finding out what court is going to hear the case.”


View this Post in: Spanish

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Webnews
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • blogmarks
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live-MSN
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • YahooBuzz
  • YahooMyWeb

This post was read 97 times until now

Nothing related to this article

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. In addition, under the conditions of the FAIR USE NOTICE, The material used on Mexico Trucker may be copyrighted material, and the use of it on Mexicotrucker.com may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available on a non-profit basis for educational and discussion purposes only. We believe this constitutes a ‘FAIR USE’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 USC § 107. For more information go to: <url>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml</url> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘FAIR USE’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Additionally, we reserve to moderate, edit or delete any comments which are designed to be slanderous, libelous or a deliberate attack against the character of the sites owners. Debate is good. Personal attacks will not be tolerated.