Fight looms over Mexican trucks
Sep 12, 2007 General Interest
By David J. Lynch, USA TODAY
Congress is headed for a showdown with President Bush over allowing long-haul Mexican trucks unfettered access to U.S. highways.
The United States promised in the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement to allow trucks from Mexico to carry goods directly to any destination in the country. But opposition from labor and environmental groups kept the program on hold until Monday, when the first Mexican truck crossed the border bound for North Carolina.
Both the House and Senate have passed by overwhelming margins legislation that would kill a Transportation Department trial granting access to up to 100 Mexican trucking companies. (Canadian trucks have enjoyed the run of the country since 1982.) The 75-23 Senate vote, on an amendment to a transportation funding bill by Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., came late Tuesday night. The House passed a similar measure 411-3 in May.
“We don’t have equivalent standards and most especially enforcement of these standards. … To allow long-haul Mexican trucks under these circumstances would cause safety questions on American roads,” Dorgan said in an interview.
Program supporters say safety is a smoke screen for protectionism. In 2006, 23.3% of American trucks flunked U.S. roadside inspections vs. 21.2% of Mexican trucks. “This reeks of protectionism,” says economist Barbara Kotschwar of the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Likewise, in Texas, which bears the brunt of NAFTA truck traffic, state officials say they’ve seen little difference between the safety records of American and Mexican trucks. “It’s my impression they run about the same,” said Tela Mange, spokeswoman for the Texas Department of Public Safety.
Mexican trucks now enter the USA and transfer their cargo to a second truck, which operates only in the border area. The load then moves to an American vehicle that carries it to its final destination. If the program proceeds, one Mexican truck could do the work that now requires three vehicles.
John Hill, head of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, says his agency will inspect every Mexican truck to verify that it meets U.S. safety standards.
Dorgan, who calls NAFTA “a colossal failure,” isn’t convinced. He cites a report by the department’s inspector general, which said Hill’s agency “had not developed sufficient plans for checking every demonstration project truck.”
Hill says those concerns have been resolved. The trial program will continue for the rest of this month, while lawmakers work on merging their respective bills. Bush has threatened a veto.
Editors Note: I truly think the opinon of an economist whose job it is to know these things and the spokesperson for the Texas DPS, an agency on the front line of truck safety enforcement, would tend to have the facts to back up their statements and are much more credible than all the Trucking Bozo’s, Jimbo Hoffa’s, Todd Spencer’s and the rest of the critics of the program. This issue should be decided on the facts and not on anecdotal fantasy.
This post was read 48 times until now





























September 13th, 2007 at 9:37
This bad deal was made in 1994…
The world was a different place then.
The few people that pushed this on the Americans even have to agree on that.
As of Sept. 11, 2001 We have to realy take a look at who is in our Country and Why. We can not just take anyones word any more… we invited all of the hijackers into our country and treated them like Guests and look what they did.
We can not let that happen again.. Our Southern Boarder is Swiss Cheese and we have no control over what is going on out there at any given time of the day or night. We have to Close our Borders for our own safty.
Sorry if the People OF Mexico are not happy but they have shown us that they have no regard for the Rule of law or the American People.
This is after all OUR country even if Mexico sees us as their privet Welfare State.. We have to do what is best for Americans and for OUR Country not theirs.
If Mexico wants a better standard of living then get off of their buts and make it happen… It did not happen over night for us… We had to work very hard at it. That is why we do not just want to give it away. We are proud of our History of hard work and genuine care and concern for our families… We belive in making something that will last for our children’s children and many generations after that…. We have to protect what we have in any way possable and if you do not like it well to bad.
View this Comment in:
September 14th, 2007 at 9:18
You might want to really look at what is coming out of Mexico City these days and not take to heart the translations and opinions of those who have a hard on against anything Mexican.
I was reading an article yesterday where Calderon is preparing an overhaul of the countries tax system and the politicians were acknowledging the need to do and also acknowledging the steady drain of Mexico’s work force. The government doesn’t SEND them here.
But where the drivers in the Pilot program are concerned. If that mans license say Jose Jimanez, you can bet your ass that is who he is. It is total and complete bullshit that Mexico nor the U.S. has a way to check a persons background. Every person who holds a B1/B2 laser visa has gone through a background check before being issued one, by our State Department. Since these drivers need to have one including and I94, you can bet they’ve been checked out in the same manner. That is just more of Jimmy Hoffa’s bullshit……
Good discussion here and if it doesn’t make any sense what I said, it’s because I’ve been up for 36 hours and now it’s time to get some sleep before I start back to Laredo.
View this Comment in: